New Court Decision April 30, 2024
June 3, 2024
May 2, 2024
VoIP-Pal Receives a Favorable Ruling in the Northern District of Texas
March 18, 2024
VoIP-Pal Announces Three New Special Advisor Appointments
December 4,, 2023
VoIP-Pal Receives Favorable Ruling in Court in the Case Against Locksmith
November 20, 2023
VoIP-Pal Has Successfully Defeated An Ex Parte Reexamination Challenge Against the ’606 Patent
November 1, 2023
VoIP-Pal.com Inc. Receives Two New Patent Grants in India
October 5, 2023
VoIP-Pal Receives Another Favorable IPR Decision from the USPTO
August 1, 2023
VoIP-Pal Receives Favorable IPR Institution Decisions
July 11, 2023
VoIP-Pal Provides an Update on Recent Developments in Its Patent Litigation
Voip-Pal.com, Inc. Receives Media Attention in Two Recent Articles in Leading Business Publications
July 12, 2018 -- Voip-Pal.com Inc. (“Voip-Pal”, “Company”) (OTCQB: VPLM) is pleased to announce that the Company is the subject of two recent articles appearing in two well-respected business publications, namely, IPWatchdog.com, and Flynn’s Harp, written by Mike Flynn, former editor and publisher of the Puget Sound Business Journal. Both articles have been posted in the news section of the Company website www.voip-pal.com.
Voip-Pal, CEO, Emil Malak stated, “We are pleased to be receiving this media attention and we hope these articles can bring national attention to our Company and our fight to monetize our patented intellectual property.”
The IPWatchdog article addresses the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (PTAB) delay in ruling on Apple’s Motion for Sanctions, filed in December 2017, one month after Voip-Pal received Final Written Decisions in two IPRs filed by Apple, in which the PTAB rejected Apple’s arguments and upheld the validity of Voip-Pal’s patents. A total of six other IPR challenges were filed against Voip-Pal, all of which ended in rulings by the PTAB in Voip-Pal’s favor.
Mr. Malak also said, “We respect the Final Written Decisions made by the PTAB judges, which were based purely on the technical merits in the challenges against our patents. We look forward to receiving the PTAB’s decision on the pending sanctions motion in due course.”